A Publicly Traded Venture Capital Company
Investing in Tiny Technology |
SIX MONTHS' REPORT 2003 |
|
FELLOW
SHAREHOLDERS: |
During the first six months of 2003 ended June 30, we continued to build our portfolio of privately held tiny technology companies (companies developing nanotechnology, microsystems or microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)), by making three new investments and one follow-on investment. Those investments totaled $2,945,618. |
New Investment
|
Amount |
|
|
Chlorogen, Inc. |
$525,900 |
NanoGram Devices Corporation |
$750,000 |
Nanosys, Inc. |
$1,500,000 |
|
|
Follow-on Investment
|
|
|
|
Nanotechnologies, Inc. |
$169,718 |
|
$2,945,618 |
Since August of 2001, we have made initial venture capital investments exclusively in tiny technology, with emphasis on companies working at the nanoscale, and we now have 13 tiny technology companies in our venture capital portfolio. Thus, since 2001, there has been a marked shift in the composition of our venture capital portfolio. |
Category
|
June 30, 2003
|
December 31, 2002
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Tiny Technology |
57% |
49% |
9% |
|
|
|
|
Other Venture Capital
Investments |
43% |
51% |
91% |
|
|
|
|
Total Venture Capital
Investments |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Moreover, since the close of
the first half of 2003 to the date of this letter, August 29, 2003, we have
made one more follow-on investment, in the amount of $323,000, in one of our
tiny technology portfolio companies working at the nanoscale that has not yet
announced the financing. We have
agreed also to make a follow-on investment of up to $250,000 in another of
our tiny technology portfolio companies working at the nanoscale. |
|
Most of the dollar value of our
non-tiny technology portfolio investments is concentrated in two companies,
NeuroMetrix, Inc. ($5,075,426) and Experion Systems, Inc. ($1,037,000). These two investments pre-dated our
decision to invest strictly in tiny technology, and these two companies are
now more mature than our more recent tiny technology investments. Given the weighting of these two
investments in our portfolio, you may wish to visit their respective
websites, www.neurometrix.com and www.experionsystems.com. |
|
On occasion, some ask how the
accounting regulations work for business development companies (BDCs) such as
our Company. We urge our shareholders
to read our Forms 10-Q and 10-K in their entirety and to pay particular
attention to the Asset Valuation Policy Guidelines. In our most recent Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2003, these Guidelines are found on pages 10-12. In reading them, you will note among other things, that
"unrestricted securities with readily available market quotations are to
be valued at the current market value; all other assets must be valued at
"fair value" as determined by or under the direction of the Board
of Directors…. |
|
"Fair value is generally
defined as the amount that an investment could be sold for in an orderly
disposition over a reasonable time.
Generally, to increase objectively in valuing the assets of the
Company, external measures of value, such as public markets or third-party
transactions, are utilized whenever possible. Valuation is not based on long-term work-out value, nor
immediate liquidation value, nor incremental value for potential change that
may take place in the future. |
|
"The values assigned to
these investments are based on available information and do not necessarily
represent amounts that might ultimately be realized, as such amounts depend
on future circumstances and cannot reasonably be determined until the
individual investments are actually liquidated." |
|
When we make a venture capital
investment, it typically does not go on our books at its actual full economic
cost to us, as we expense all of the unreimbursed direct and indirect costs
of due diligence and closing costs as well as our general corporate
overhead. Nor is it subsequently
valued on our books based on any expectations about the future. Consequently, the full economic cost, or
replacement cost, is typically greater than the initial valuation of the
investment for purposes of calculating NAV, and subsequent quarterly
valuations of the investment do not include any speculations about future
sale or IPO values. |
|
We hope that this letter helps our shareholders become more familiar with our Asset Valuation Policy Guidelines. Shareholders who wish to delve into the general performance characteristics of venture capital funds might start by going to the websites of CalPERS (http://www.calpers.ca.gov/invest/aim/review.asp) and The University of Texas Investment Management Company (http://www.utimco.org/funds/allfunds/privatemarkets/documentirrcalculationsold.pdf) to read their discussions of the "J-curve phenomenon." |
|
In closing, we appreciate the continuing support of our shareholders as we continue to build our Company into an increasingly pure play in tiny technology. In the last 12 months alone, we have reviewed 125 business plans of companies that we classify as tiny technology enabled. Of these 125, we have funded three so far. We have a lot of work ahead, and in keeping with the nature of our business, we will continue to encounter bumps in the road with these high-risk investments. But the quantity and quality of our deal flow tells us that we have chosen the right path for our Company, in our exclusive focus on tiny technology. |
Charles
E. Harris |
Mel
P. Melsheimer |
Douglas
W. Jamison |
Chairman
and CEO |
President
& COO |
Vice
President |
August 29, 2003 |
This
letter may contain statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future
events. These forward-looking
statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future
results and conditions. These
statements reflect the Company's current beliefs, and a number of important
factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in this letter. Please see the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and recent Prospectus filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for a more detailed discussion of the
risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business, including but
not limited to the risks and uncertainties associated with venture capital
investing and other significant factors that could affect the Company's
actual results. Except as otherwise
required by Federal securities laws, Harris & Harris Group, Inc.
undertakes no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements
to reflect new events or uncertainties. |
|
||
|
Unaudited Schedule of Investments* |
|
|
(As
of June 30, 2003) |
|
|
Shares/ |
|
|
Principal |
Value |
|
|
|
Agile
Materials & Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
||
Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock |
3,732,736 |
$ 1,000,000 |
||
|
|
|
||
AlphaSimplex Group, LLC |
|
|
||
Limited
Liability Company interest |
--
|
106,250 |
||
|
|
|
||
Chlorogen,
Inc. |
|
|
||
Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock |
3,000,000 |
525,900 |
||
|
|
|
||
Continuum Photonics, Inc. |
|
|
||
Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock |
2,000,000 |
86,380 |
||
|
|
|
||
Experion
Systems, Inc. |
|
|
||
Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock |
294,118 |
|
||
Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock |
35,294 |
|
||
Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock |
222,184 |
1,037,000 |
||
|
|
|
||
Exponential Business
Development Company |
|
|
||
Limited
Partnership interest |
--
|
25,000 |
||
|
|
|
||
Kriton Medical, Inc. |
|
|
||
Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock |
476,191 |
0 |
||
|
|
|
||
NanoGram Corporation |
|
|
||
Series
1 Preferred Stock |
63,210 |
21,672 |
||
|
|
|
||
NanoGram Devices
Corporation |
|
|
||
Series
A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock |
63,210 |
|
||
Series
A-2 Convertible Preferred Stock |
750,000 |
813,210 |
||
|
|
|
||
NanoOpto Corporation |
|
|
||
Series
A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock |
267,857 |
128,292 |
||
|
|
<span style |